Understanding the Differences between EIP-4337 and zkSync Era: A Comprehensive Analysis of Native Account Abstraction
According to reports, zkSync posted an article on social media explaining the difference between EIP-4337 and zkSync Era in terms of native account abstraction.
According to reports, zkSync posted an article on social media explaining the difference between EIP-4337 and zkSync Era in terms of native account abstraction. zkSync stated that in order to avoid hard forking, EIP-4337 made some compromises, such as external owned accounts (EOA) and account abstractions (AA), separate transaction streams, separate memory pools, separate authenticator/binder roles, and external owned accounts that cannot use Paymasters, ZkSync has improved EIP-4337 by integrating account abstraction at the protocol level, and the above functions can be implemented.
ZkSync: EIP-4337 Compromises to Avoid Hard Bifurcation
Introduction
Recently, zkSync posted an article on social media, highlighting the differences between EIP-4337 and zkSync Era in terms of native account abstraction. The post claimed that zkSync integrated account abstraction at the protocol level, which resulted in improved functionalities compared to EIP-4337.
In this article, we will delve deeper into the subject matter and analyze the key differences between the two approaches.
What is Account Abstraction?
Before discussing the differences between EIP-4337 and zkSync Era, it is important to understand what account abstraction means. Account abstraction is a concept that allows developers to separate the transaction execution from the underlying account model.
In other words, account abstraction improves the flexibility and functionality of the Ethereum network by allowing developers to implement new execution models without necessarily changing the account model.
The Differences Between EIP-4337 and zkSync Era
The following are the key differences between EIP-4337 and zkSync Era in terms of native account abstraction:
External Owned Accounts (EOA) and Account Abstractions (AA)
EIP-4337 created separate transaction streams and memory pools for EOAs and AAs. This implementation resulted in some limitations as external owned accounts cannot use Paymasters.
On the other hand, zkSync Era integrated account abstraction at the protocol level, which eliminated the need for such separations, and EOAs and AAs are now treated similarly, offering more flexibility to developers.
Separate Authenticator/Binder Roles
EIP-4337 introduced separate authenticator/binder roles to avoid the hard fork. However, this implementation resulted in adding additional complexity to the platform.
In contrast, zkSync Era integrated account abstraction at the protocol level, making authentication and binding simpler and more straightforward.
Integration of Account Abstraction at the Protocol Level
ZkSync Era’s most significant difference from EIP-4337 is the integration of account abstraction at the protocol level. As a result, developers can now easily create new account models without changing the underlying account structure.
Moreover, zkSync Era enables developers to optimize and customize the execution environment as they see fit, which is not possible with EIP-4337.
Conclusion
In conclusion, EIP-4337 and zkSync Era approach the concept of account abstraction differently. While EIP-4337 made some compromises to avoid hard forking, zkSync Era integrated account abstraction at the protocol level, improving its efficiencies.
Furthermore, zkSync Era’s integration of account abstraction at the protocol level offers developers more flexibility and customization, which is essential in the ever-evolving blockchain industry.
FAQs
1. What is account abstraction?
Account abstraction is a concept that allows developers to separate the transaction execution from the underlying account model, improving flexibility and functionality of the Ethereum network.
2. What is the difference between EIP-4337 and zkSync Era in terms of native account abstraction?
The main difference is that zkSync Era integrated account abstraction at the protocol level, while EIP-4337 made some compromises to avoid hard forking.
3. Why is account abstraction important in the blockchain industry?
Account abstraction offers developers the ability to create new execution models without necessarily changing the underlying account model, offering more flexibility and customization options for the network.
This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent aiwaka's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.aiwaka.com/2023/03/29/understanding-the-differences-between-eip-4337-and-zksync-era-a-comprehensive-analysis-of-native-account-abstraction/
It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.