DefiLlama’s Internal Divisions and the Potential Threat of Unsustainable Business Practices

On March 19th, according to the news, \”DefiLlama is facing internal divisions,\” Andre Cronje said that when you don\’t pay the bill, it\’s easy to generate ideolo

DefiLlamas Internal Divisions and the Potential Threat of Unsustainable Business Practices

On March 19th, according to the news, “DefiLlama is facing internal divisions,” Andre Cronje said that when you don’t pay the bill, it’s easy to generate ideology. For years, Charlie Watkins, the co founder of DefiLlama, has been paying all DefiLlama fees out of his own pocket, which is not cheap. It’s disgusting to watch everyone sneer at what he has done. His attempt to stop bleeding is not greed, but sustainability. Let’s see how long they can hold out without his “free money”. They will soon propose or add advertisements or tokens.

AC Talk about “DefiLlama Faces Internal Splitting”: Founder Charlie previously paid all the expenses himself, trying to stop bleeding is not greed

Analysis based on this information:


The message relates to the ongoing internal divisions within DefiLlama, a decentralized finance platform that has been struggling to sustain initiatives that require significant capital investments. According to the news, the co-founder of DefiLlama, Charlie Watkins, has been paying all the DefiLlama fees out of his own pocket for years, which has been misinterpreted by some as being driven by greed. However, Andre Cronje’s statement that “when you don’t pay the bill, it’s easy to generate ideology” implies that such misunderstandings can be avoided by a better understanding of the dynamics of running a sustainable business.

It is evident from this message that the current situation in DefiLlama is alarming and unsustainable. Without Watkins’ financial backing, it seems that DefiLlama may struggle to sustain its operations. Cronje suggests that some members may try to generate revenue by adding advertisements or proposing the creation of new tokens. While these may help to bring in revenue, they are not a sustainable long-term solution for the platform.

Internal divisions within DefiLlama must be addressed to ensure the platform’s survival. The message also highlights the importance of establishing a viable business model that is not solely reliant on the funding of a single individual. If DefiLlama wishes to remain competitive in the decentralized finance space, it must navigate these challenges with prudence and a long-term vision for sustainability.

Overall, while Charlie Watkins’ contributions to DefiLlama are indeed commendable, they should not be viewed as a sustainable model for business practices. The platform must be able to generate consistent revenue streams to fund its operations independently. The internal divisions within DefiLlama are a warning sign that the platform’s business practices must be reevaluated and improved upon to ensure its viability in the long run.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent aiwaka's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.aiwaka.com/2023/03/19/defillamas-internal-divisions-and-the-potential-threat-of-unsustainable-business-practices/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.