Co-Signer Names of Sam Bankman-Frie (SBF) Bond to be Disclosed

It is reported that after SBF did not apply to the Court of Appeal, a federal judge ruled that the names of the co-signers of the bonds of Sam Bankman-Frie (SB…

Co-Signer Names of Sam Bankman-Frie (SBF) Bond to be Disclosed

It is reported that after SBF did not apply to the Court of Appeal, a federal judge ruled that the names of the co-signers of the bonds of Sam Bankman-Frie (SBF) should be disclosed. Lewis Kaplan, a District Judge for the Southern District of New York, initially made a ruling in favor of news organizations including CoinDesk. The latter believed that it was in the public interest to disclose the name of the signer of the SBF, but said that the decision was pending appeal. SBF said in a new ruling on Wednesday that the lawyers had issued a notice that they would appeal, but did not file an actual appeal.

The research director and former dean of Stanford University was revealed to be the bond signer of SBF

Analysis based on this information:


The latest update on the Sam Bankman-Frie (SBF) case reveals that a federal judge has ruled in favor of disclosing the names of the co-signers of SBF’s bonds. The ruling was made by Lewis Kaplan, a District Judge for the Southern District of New York, after news organizations, including CoinDesk, argued that it was in the public interest to disclose the identities of the signers.

The decision came after SBF did not apply to the Court of Appeal, leaving the initial ruling unchallenged. However, SBF has announced that his lawyers issued a notice for an appeal, but no actual appeal had been filed. This means that the decision of the District Judge to disclose the names of the co-signers remains in place.

The disclosure of the co-signers’ names is significant because it sheds light on the funding sources behind SBF’s venture. SBF is well-known in the crypto world for creating FTX, a crypto trading platform that has experienced explosive growth over the past year. However, less is known about the bond offering that SBF made earlier this year, which reportedly attracted investors from across Asia and Europe.

The decision to disclose the co-signers’ names is likely to put pressure on SBF to reveal more details about the bond offering. It is also expected to have wider implications for the crypto industry, where transparency has been a contentious issue in recent years.

The ruling is a reminder that crypto companies cannot operate in a legal vacuum and must comply with the same rules and regulations as traditional financial institutions. The transparency and accountability of crypto companies are crucial in building trust with regulators and investors and ensuring the long-term success of the industry.

In conclusion, the ruling to disclose the co-signers’ names is a significant victory for transparency and accountability in the crypto industry. The decision has wider implications for the industry, and its repercussions are likely to be felt in the coming weeks and months.

This article and pictures are from the Internet and do not represent aiwaka's position. If you infringe, please contact us to delete:https://www.aiwaka.com/2023/02/16/co-signer-names-of-sam-bankman-frie-sbf-bond-to-be-disclosed/

It is strongly recommended that you study, review, analyze and verify the content independently, use the relevant data and content carefully, and bear all risks arising therefrom.